One of my earliest attempts to formulate the argument of my Prague Trilogy was in a keynote lecture I wrote for the conference New Directions in Writing European History at the Middle Eastern Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, on October 25-6, 1994. I was one of three keynote speakers, along with Paul Langford and John Hall. My lecture was titled “Prague as a Vantage Point on Modern European History. ”
The conference proceedings, including the three keynote lectures, responses by Turkish scholars, and a transcript of audience questions and panel discussions, were published in English in METU Studies in Development, vol. 22, no. 3, 1995.
I am pleased to belatedly discover that my lecture, along with those of John Hall and Paul Langford, has appeared in Turkish translation in Huri Islamoglu (ed.), Neden Avrupa Tarihi (Istanbul: Iletisim Yayincilik, 2nd ed, 2014). I like the cover too.
The title means “Why European history?”—a good question. I began my contribution to the discussion of John Hall’s paper (which was titled “The Rise of the West”) as follows:
I found the presentation very compelling and I was suspicious precisely because of that. It was the clarity, the simplicity, the elegance of it that came across so strongly, but I wonder can you do that when you are talking about 2000 years of European history and contrasting it with the rest of the world? Can you compass that complexity within so simple an argumentative framework, within a single theory? I want to try to pin you down by asking three simple questions …
The simple questions are: first, what is Europe? Second, where is the West? And third, when was modernity?
Given the appalling repression going on in Turkish universities since the failed coup in 2016, it is heartening that such texts are still being published.